🔗 Share this article

Deductibles. Preferred providers. Non-preferred providers. Concierge medical services. Personal healthcare costs. Co-payment. Shared insurance. Insurance consultants. Coverage agents. Medical advisors. ACA. Health Maintenance Organization. PPO. EPO. Point of Service. HDHP. HSA. FSA. Health Reimbursement Arrangement. Explanation of Benefits. Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act. SHOP. Individual coverage. Dependent coverage. Premium tax credits.

Baffled? It's understandable. Who comprehends all this stuff? Certainly not the average business owner. Neither the average worker. Selecting the right healthcare insurance for companies – or for our families – seems like demands a PhD in healthcare.

The Medical System Isn't Just Complex, It Is Costly

Based on a recent study, typical households spends $twenty-seven thousand annually on medical coverage (up 6% from last year). The average company healthcare expense is projected to exceed $17,000 per employee in 2026, a 9.5% jump compared to 2025.

Now federal operations has ceased functioning due to partisan disputes over subsidies that experts say could cause premium increases up to 100% for millions of Americans.

When Might We Seriously Consider Universal Healthcare?

How soon might we seriously consider a national health insurance program here in America? I have to believe we're getting closer because this situation is unsustainable.

I'm not proposing government-run medicine. I'm advocating that our already existing Medicare system – an established insurance framework – merely extend to include all citizens. The existing system doesn't change. The way our healthcare providers get paid changes. Trust me, they'll adapt.

The Way National Health Insurance Could Function

Universal healthcare coverage would require payments from employees and employers. In comparable systems, a worker earning average wages pays about 5.3% toward medical coverage. The company pays about 13.75%.

Does this seem expensive? Unless you contrast it to what the typical American pays. I can name multiple businesses who are routinely paying anywhere from eight to fifteen percent of payroll costs for medical benefits. Remember that with inclusive programs, those payments also cover retirement benefits, illness coverage, parental benefits and job loss protection along with funding healthcare facilities. When you add those costs compared with what we pay for our retirement plans, job loss coverage and paid time off, the gap narrows.

Execution for America

In the US, a national health premium would raise existing Medicare taxes, a framework that is already in place. It should be means-based – wealthier individuals would pay more than those earning less. There would be both an employee and employer contribution. Similar to much of our government's defense, technology, welfare services and infrastructure, the program should be outsourced to third-party administrators instead of federal agencies.

Benefits for Small Businesses

Universal healthcare coverage would be a significant advantage for small businesses such as my company. It would put small companies in equal competition against big corporations who can afford better plans. It would render administration significantly simpler (automatic payroll withholding processed similarly to social security and healthcare taxes, instead of separate payments to insurance companies and coverage administrators).

It would make it easier for us to budget annual expenditures, rather than going through the complicated (and ineffective) theater of negotiating with the big insurance providers that we must do each year. Because it's simplified, there would exist a better understanding of coverage by our employees – contrasted with existing arrangements where they have to decipher the complexities of current options. Additionally there would definitely exist less liability for employers since we wouldn't would be privy to our employees' medical records for purposes of risk assessment and alternative plans.

Free-Market Viewpoint

I'm as pro-market as possible. However I recognize that government play important functions in society, from providing defense to funding needed infrastructure. Providing healthcare to all through a national insurance system enhances our economy's infrastructure. It represents superior, simpler approach for small businesses that employ more than half of the country's workers and generate half of our GDP. It makes it possible for workers to be healthier, have better attendance and be more productive.

Addressing Concerns

Exist numerous factors I haven't covered? Certainly. Given rising medical expenses experienced in recent years, it's evident that current healthcare legislation isn't functioning very well. I understand that America isn't a compact European nation where big changes are easier to implement. However extending universal Medicare, despite increased taxation required, would still be a better and less expensive strategy both for controlling healthcare costs but providing access to everyone.

Need for Honest Assessment

We as Americans, we need to tone down our own arrogance. America's medical care isn't so great. We rank significantly behind many other countries in healthcare quality globally, according to comprehensive research. Perhaps a positive aspect in this current situation is that we undertake serious examination in the mirror and acknowledge that big changes are necessary.